What-If Analysis
Scenario Planner • Adjust objective weights and compare outcomes
Objective Weights
Adjust the importance of each objective. Total must equal 100%.
Total
100%
CURRENT
Balanced
Default weights optimizing for overall performance
OTIF Rate
97.2%
Utilization
89%
Weekly Profit
$1.42M
Changeover Hrs
58 hrs
Aggressive Delivery
Prioritize 100% on-time at any cost
OTIF Rate
99.8%
Utilization
76%
Weekly Profit
$1.18M
Changeover Hrs
82 hrs
Cost Minimization
Reduce changeover and maximize efficiency
OTIF Rate
91.4%
Utilization
94%
Weekly Profit
$1.58M
Changeover Hrs
42 hrs
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | Balanced | Aggressive | Cost Min |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-Time In-Full (OTIF) | 97.2% | 99.8% | 91.4% |
| Utilization Rate | 89% | 76% | 94% |
| Weekly Profit | $1.42M | $1.18M | $1.58M |
| Changeover Hours | 58 hrs | 82 hrs | 42 hrs |
| Late Penalties | $12K | $2K | $47K |
| VIP Orders On-Time | 100% | 100% | 96% |
AI Recommendation
Based on your historical data and current
constraints
The Balanced scenario is recommended for your current situation.
While the Cost Minimization option saves $160K/week more, it risks
2 VIP orders being late, which could damage key customer relationships.
The Aggressive Delivery option ensures perfect delivery but at $240K/week lower
profit.
The Balanced scenario achieves 97.2% OTIF while maintaining 100% VIP coverage and delivers the second-highest profit — the optimal trade-off for long-term business health.
The Balanced scenario achieves 97.2% OTIF while maintaining 100% VIP coverage and delivers the second-highest profit — the optimal trade-off for long-term business health.